6.7 KiB
6.7 KiB
Offboarding Requirements vs Implementation Gap Report
Date: 2026-04-17
Source baseline: backend/docs/Re_New_Dealer_Onboard_TWO.md
Purpose
This report captures:
- What the SRS requires for offboarding-related modules.
- What is implemented in the current codebase.
- What is still missing or needs standardization.
1) SRS Requirements (What document asks)
1.1 Common cross-module requirements
- Role-driven stage workflow across Resignation, Termination, Constitutional Change, Relocation, and F&F.
- Stage actions include combinations of
Approve,Send Back,Revoke, and module-specific decisions such asHold,Reject,Reconsider,Raise Query. Send BackandRevokemust be recorded through Work Notes with mandatory remarks.- Every action, upload, and transition must be logged in Audit Trail.
- Visibility and actionability must follow persona-based access control.
1.2 Resignation (SRS sections 4.2.2.x, 12.1.x)
- Multi-stage review with business hierarchy and Legal closure.
- Authorized users can
Approve,Send Back,Revokeper stage authority. - Dealer withdrawal allowed only up to NBH-pending state.
- F&F must trigger strictly on Last Working Day (LWD), not approval date.
1.3 Termination (SRS sections 4.3.2.x)
- Escalation workflow from business review to legal process and final authorization.
- NBH stage includes
Go Ahead,Hold Decision,Raise Query. - NBH final decision includes
Approve Termination,Reconsider,Reject. - CEO/CCO authorization before legal termination letter and closure.
- F&F trigger aligned to LWD rule.
1.4 Constitutional Change (SRS section 12.2.x)
- Dealer-initiated request with scenario-based mandatory documents.
- Internal review stages support
Approve,Send Back,Revoke. - Work Notes + mandatory remarks for send-back/revoke.
- Compliance verification and final master update by Legal stage.
1.5 Relocation (SRS relocation section under 12.2.x)
- Dealer-initiated relocation with document checklist and verification.
- Internal stages support
Approve,Send Back,Revoke. - Work Notes and audit logging for all reviewer actions.
1.6 F&F Settlement (SRS sections 10.x, 11.2.x)
- Department-wise responses feed Finance summary and settlement decision.
- Finance actions include
Approve Settlement,Request Clarification,Reject Settlement. - Checklist-gated approval and complete auditability.
- Work Notes as official internal communication channel.
2) Implemented in Current Codebase
2.1 F&F conflict-free ownership and UX improvements
- Department claim vs finance validated layering is implemented in settlement flow.
- Auto-seeding of finance draft line items from department claims is implemented.
- Finance detail UI supports local draft editing and save-based API update pattern.
- Reconciliation table for department vs finance amounts added in internal F&F views.
2.2 Resignation and termination role visibility fixes
- Sidebar and route access expanded for roles such as RBM, ZBH, DD Head, Legal Admin where required.
- Role checks normalized around
roleandroleCodeusage. RoleGuardmatching made case-insensitive and more robust.
2.3 Termination workflow and API wiring
- Termination creation now starts at
RBM Reviewstage. - SCN APIs implemented (
/scn,/scn-response) with stage transition handling. - Finalize API implemented (
/:id/finalize) for NBH/CCO/CEO related final decisions. - Timeline rendering logic corrected to map remarks to correct stage entries.
- Stage progression and status rendering improved (including terminated-state completion).
2.4 Constitutional joint approval (ZM+RBM)
- Joint approval logic implemented in backend for
ZM/RBM Reviewstage using approval policy. - Seed policy added for
CONSTITUTIONAL_ZM_RBM_REVIEWwith required roles and two approvals. - Frontend updated to show
ZM+RBMlabeling and prevent duplicate self-approval actions. - Progress UI now reflects both RBM and DD-ZM comments and "Approved by you" state.
2.5 Dealer and detail data correctness
- Active dealer filtering introduced for dropdown usage.
- Dealer email exposure fixed in related detail screens (termination/resignation context).
3) Missing / Gap Analysis (What is still pending)
3.1 Send-back standardization across modules (High priority)
Current state is partially aligned but not fully standardized.
Missing standard contract across modules:
- Unified action contract (for example:
action=sendBackwith mandatoryremarks). - Deterministic previous-stage routing logic shared across modules.
- Consistent role-guard enforcement for send-back by stage owner/authorized roles.
- Consistent work note + audit payload structure for each send-back/revoke action.
3.2 Termination send-back hardening (Highest gap)
- Termination supports major transitions, but send-back behavior still needs full standard handling parity with other modules.
- Need explicit, centrally testable behavior for stage rollback and notifications on send-back paths.
3.3 Constitutional send-back to joint stage reset behavior
- If a case is sent back to
ZM+RBMfrom later stage, joint approvals must be reset for a fresh cycle. - This reset behavior should be explicit and deterministic in controller/service layer.
3.4 Remaining UX consistency tasks
- Add explicit final summary label in F&F: "Final settlement uses Finance Validated values."
- Add first-time "auto-seeded" badge for finance prefilled rows.
- Apply smooth edit pattern consistency to non-finance F&F detail editing where applicable.
- Improve timeline labels in termination to distinguish stage initiation vs stage action (if required by UX acceptance).
3.5 Policy and admin-config visibility
- Approval policy UI should expose the constitutional joint-review policy label for admin maintenance.
- Legal Admin read-scope definitions across modules should be formalized if strict SRS interpretation is required.
4) Recommended Next Execution Order
- Standardize send-back contract and validations in backend services (start with Termination).
- Add shared rollback resolver for previous stage routing.
- Add module-specific send-back hooks (including joint-approval reset for Constitutional).
- Align frontend action payloads and button guards to shared contract.
- Add regression tests for send-back/revoke in each module.
- Complete UX consistency items in F&F and timelines.
5) Status Snapshot
- SRS intent coverage: Medium-High
- Core flow implementation: High in Resignation/F&F, Medium-High in Termination/Constitutional/Relocation
- Main risk: inconsistent send-back behavior across modules
- Immediate focus: send-back standardization + deterministic rollback behavior