Why PostgreSQL Wins for "Royal Enfield Workflow"

Executive Summary

For "Royal Enfield Workflow", PostgreSQL is superior to MongoDB. The decision rests on Reporting Speed and Deep Filtering capabilities. Your workflow requires filtering by Relationships (Approvers, Departments), not just static data.

1. Complex Workflow Filters (The "My Tasks" Problem)

Users need specific views like "Requests waiting for me" or "Paused requests".

A. "Requests Open For Me" (The Join Filter)

Scenario: Show all requests where I am the current approver.

PostgreSQL (Simple SQL `JOIN`)

Index usage is perfect. The DB jumps mainly to the few rows in approval_levels assigned to you.

SELECT r.id, r.status, r.created_at
FROM workflow_requests r
JOIN approval_levels al ON r.id = al.request_id
WHERE al.approver_id = 'USER_UUID_123' 
  AND al.status = 'PENDING'
ORDER BY r.created_at DESC;

MongoDB (Array Query + Sort Issue)

You must index inside an array. If you sort by "Date", Mongo often cannot use the index effectively for both the array match and the sort, leading to slow scans.

db.requests.find({
  "approvers": { 
    $elemMatch: { 
      userId: "USER_UUID_123", 
      status: "PENDING" 
    } 
  }
}).sort({ createdAt: -1 }); 
// WARNING: Performance degrades heavily if user has many historical requests

B. "Paused & Resumed" History

Scenario: Show requests that were previously Paused but are now Active (requires checking history).

PostgreSQL (Audit Log Join)

You query the history table directly without loading the main request data until the match is found.

SELECT DISTINCT r.* 
FROM workflow_requests r
JOIN audit_logs log ON r.id = log.request_id
WHERE log.action = 'PAUSED'
  AND r.status = 'IN_PROGRESS';

MongoDB (The "Lookup" or "Bloat" Trade-off)

Option 1: Lookups (Slow) You have to join the separate audit_logs collection for every request.

db.requests.aggregate([
  { $match: { status: "IN_PROGRESS" } },
  {
    $lookup: {
      from: "audit_logs",
      localField: "_id", 
      foreignField: "requestId",
      as: "history"
    }
  },
  { $match: { "history.action": "PAUSED" } }
]);

Option 2: Embedding (Bloated) You store every log inside the Request document.

Result: Your generic db.requests.find({}) becomes 10x slower because it's dragging megabytes of history logs across the network for every result.

2. The Filter Nightmare: "Deep Filtering"

Users expect to slice-and-dice data freely. Example: "Show requests initiated by users in the 'Sales' Department".

Postgres (Cross-Table Filter):
```
SELECT * FROM workflow_requests r
JOIN users u ON r.initiator_id = u.id
WHERE u.department = 'Sales'
```
- Result: Instant. SQL simply filters the users table first (using an index on department) and then grabs the matching requests.
MongoDB (The "Lookup" Trap):
- Department is stored on the User document, not the Request.
- To filter Requests by "Department", you must $lookup (join) the User collection for every single request before you can filter them.
- Alternative: Copy department into every Request document.
- Maintenance Cost: If a user transfers from 'Sales' to 'Marketing', you must run a script to update all their historical requests, or your reports will be wrong.

3. Dashboard: The "Aggregation" Bottleneck

Your dashboard provides real-time insights (e.g., "Approver Efficiency," "TAT per Region").

Window Functions (SQL Superpower):
- Requirement: Rank dealers by "Average Approval Time" compared to their peers.
- Postgres: RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY region ORDER BY avg_tat) runs natively and instanly.
- MongoDB: Requires complex Aggregation Pipelines ($setWindowFields) that are memory-intensive and harder to optimize.

4. Audit & Compliance

Postgres: Foreign Key constraints prevent "Orphaned Logs." You cannot delete a User if they are referenced in an Audit Log. This guarantees legal traceability.
MongoDB: No constraints. Deleting a user can leave "Ghost Logs" (Referencing a null ID), breaking compliance reports.

Summary Verdict

Feature	PostgreSQL	MongoDB
"Open For Me"	Simple Join	Complex Array Indexing
Dept/Region Filters	Simple Join	Slow Lookup or Duplicated Data
Ad-Hoc Reports	Flexible	Rigid (Needs Indexes)
Audit Compliance	Guaranteed	Risk of Orphaned Data

Recommendation: Stick with PostgreSQL. The "Relational" nature of your reporting (Connecting Requests -> Users -> Departments -> Regions) is exactly what SQL was built to solve efficiently.

4.7 KiB Raw Blame History